News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by andygates on Monday May 22, 2017 @10:50AM (#14394019)
It's not "we agree", it's "all the different strands of evidence agree": that's the difference between a scientific consensus and a social (ie, bandwagon) one.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by curiousgeorgio on Monday May 22, 2017 @11:28AM (#14394352)
> all the different strands of evidence agree

Are you referring to evidence that suggests climate is always changing (in which case I also agree!), or evidence of AGW? If it's the latter, I'm afraid you'd be ignoring an incredibly strong body of evidence on the contrary.

Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by CuriousSkeptic on Monday May 22, 2017 @01:58PM (#14395631)
I'm afraid you've been mislead. The jury is in on this, AGW is not in dispute in the scientific community.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

(The link goes to a page with further references and papers)