Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by andygates on Monday May 22, 2017 @10:50AM
(#14394019)
It's not "we agree", it's "all the different strands of evidence agree": that's the difference between a scientific consensus and a social (ie, bandwagon) one.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by curiousgeorgio on Monday May 22, 2017 @11:28AM
(#14394352)
> all the different strands of evidence agree
Are you referring to evidence that suggests climate is always changing (in which case I also agree!), or evidence of AGW? If it's the latter, I'm afraid you'd be ignoring an incredibly strong body of evidence on the contrary.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by CuriousSkeptic on Monday May 22, 2017 @01:58PM
(#14395631)
I'm afraid you've been mislead. The jury is in on this, AGW is not in dispute in the scientific community.
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
(The link goes to a page with further references and papers)