News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by ekianjo on Monday May 22, 2017 @09:06AM (#14393210)
> end up being wrong, and are left with a clean and sustainable economy

Transformation has costs, it's not a free ride. The investment that you do there is not being done somewhere else.

Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by rainbowmverse on Monday May 22, 2017 @10:48AM (#14394009)
We're still reaping benefits of the Apollo project almost half a century later, and it cost less than what governments have spent pushing advances in clean energy that are already paying off in real economic terms. There is quite a bit of money flowing around the world, and it tends to produce more when spent. There's no shortage of money.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by ekianjo on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @01:48AM (#14399075)
> We're still reaping benefits of the Apollo project almost half a century later,

Care to elaborate about the benefits of the Apollo project?

Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by rainbowmverse on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @08:28AM (#14400609)
NASA has helpfully provided pages on this exact subject under spinoff.nasa.gov.

For Apollo in particular: https://spinoff.nasa.gov/flyers/apollo.htm

Good search query for finding more detailed analyses (not in a snarky LMGTFY way, there's just so much to list either as a direct benefit or as something made possible by those early innovations): apollo spin off technologies