Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal cities across the globe

Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by viridian on Monday May 22, 2017 @07:55AM (#14392794)

Can we not assume bad faith on behalf of other commenters? I've heard similar things from a grandparent, an older science teacher, and a CS prof I knew well. Everyone knows that science reporting is in a terrible state today, but I honestly don't think it was much better 40-50 years ago. The problem has always been that the non expert journalists that publish the stories exaggerate the outcomes of research, across the board. Painting people's experiences of popular climate science in the 70's as denialism is nonconstructive and needlessly insulting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by flukus on Monday May 22, 2017 @08:05AM (#14392851)

> Can we not assume bad faith on behalf of other commenters?

I'll try with this one, but at a certain point things just become willful ignorance, as is the case with the "in the 70's it was all about the new ice age" trope. In fact, willful ignorance would summarize OP's whole post.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by taurath on Monday May 22, 2017 @08:15AM (#14392905)

Willful ignorance doesn't jive with asking for examples.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by flukus on Monday May 22, 2017 @08:24AM (#14392948)

Assuming it was a genuine request. Astroturfers/denialists usually start out with genuine sounding questions too.

[ Parent | on HN ]