Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by i5h4n on Monday May 22, 2017 @05:48AM
(#14392225)
A really well designed article. Kudos to the web design team at NYtimes on that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by retube on Monday May 22, 2017 @05:57AM
(#14392255)
Really clunky, jittery scroll with a load of blank space for me. Would much rather a clean, simple HTML+CSS layout without all the fancy javascript. (IE 10)
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by ux-app on Monday May 22, 2017 @07:11AM
(#14392538)
> (IE 10)
try upgrading to Netscape Navigator? ;)
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by throwaway9980 on Monday May 22, 2017 @09:37AM
(#14393431)
Obvious troll is obvious. Hackernews readers don't use IE 10.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by RikNieu on Monday May 22, 2017 @08:11AM
(#14392891)
> IE 10
How dare you.
You, Sir, are part of the problem.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by Already__Taken on Monday May 22, 2017 @07:00AM
(#14392478)
10?!
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi...
by nnq on Monday May 22, 2017 @07:23AM
(#14392600)
Indeed, first time I come across such a website where scrolling is not jittery as f and either too slow or too fast! I generally hate these kinds of website, but this one seems executed flawlessly.
...or maybe kudos to the Chrome/Webkit team for finally fixing their weird scrolling behavior :) Years ago when I tried to implement such a thing myself the only browser that provided a decent experience on all platforms and devices with respect to such a scrolling-driven site was Firefox (and yeah, Safari, as Apple had a page like that themselves showing some mac pro or smth... but that worked like shit on anything except Safari on MacOS).