News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence by TazeTSchnitzel on Sunday May 21, 2017 @05:44PM (#14389413)
4chan's moderators are in an unenviable position. For example, a large number of users left because the moderators put their foot down and decided that the site would not be the base for a widespread Internet harassment campaign.

Are the users haemorrhaged from that to the detriment, or the benefit of the site?

Re:Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence by ue_ on Sunday May 21, 2017 @05:51PM (#14389439)
That's largely a matter of opinion, and you must factor in what counts as a detriment or benefit, which varies with 4chan's goals. Arguably 4chan doesn't really have a goal, though some (particularly the alt-right type people) would say it's a detriment, and people like me or some users of non-political boards think it's a benefit, as one of the large concerns is that /pol/ is infecting other boards, despite the fact that it was made as a containment board.

Others boards such as /mlp/ however do not show such growth into other boards, perhaps because the rule against ponies is stronger than the rule against racism.

Re:Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence by wcummings on Sunday May 21, 2017 @06:12PM (#14389520)
"Containment" boards are pure fantasy, they just give the worst users a place to coordinate their attacks on other boards.