Re:A Physicist Who Denies Dark Matter
by dnautics on Sunday May 21, 2017 @03:58PM
(#14388935)
why? Until direct evidence and predictions of properties emerge, from an epistemological point of view it's still a very shaky model. If it all turned out to be epicycles it wouldn't be surprising. Or maybe a better analogy is Vulcan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan_(hypothetical_planet)
The closest we have come to direct evidence are the independent calculations of the properties if it's a self-annhilating particle that agree with a certain set of observations. Even so that seriously breaks a conservation rule, because if there's no proposed way to create dark matter, the universe makes no sense.
The closest we have come to direct evidence are the independent calculations of the properties if it's a self-annhilating particle that agree with a certain set of observations. Even so that seriously breaks a conservation rule, because if there's no proposed way to create dark matter, the universe makes no sense.