Re:NIST advises services to not require that passwords be ch...
by 5706906c06c on Saturday May 20, 2017 @01:09PM
(#14383306)
The problem is that most have adopted password managers and two-factor, which means the guideline will be largely ignored.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NIST advises services to not require that passwords be ch...
by interfixus on Saturday May 20, 2017 @01:19PM
(#14383360)
Most? Do you really think so?
In my experience, the vast majority of everybody is still bumbling ahead with post-it notes and simple, memorised passwords shared all across the board.
Re:NIST advises services to not require that passwords be ch...
by 5706906c06c on Saturday May 20, 2017 @04:11PM
(#14384123)
I'm so sorry for you and your job, I guess.
Re:NIST advises services to not require that passwords be ch...
by sndean on Saturday May 20, 2017 @10:25PM
(#14385397)
The first reasonable statistic that I could find was 1%, for the percentage of individuals in a large organization that used password managers [0]. Or maybe it's 8%, in a survey [1]. That 1% figure is pretty old, and people lie in surveys, so it's possibly >1% and <8%.
The vast majority of people don't use password managers (or 2FA).
[0] https://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/08%20why...
[1] https://www.passwordboss.com/news/survey-finds-vast-majority...
Re:NIST advises services to not require that passwords be ch...
by jjawssd on Saturday May 20, 2017 @01:25PM
(#14383388)
What is your definition of most? 1%?
Re:NIST advises services to not require that passwords be ch...
by 5706906c06c on Saturday May 20, 2017 @04:12PM
(#14384127)
1%? What does that mean?