News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's Encrypt is down by majewsky on Friday May 19, 2017 @10:29AM (#14375962)
> If I am hosting 5 sites on caddy, and add a 6th one, I restart the server.

No, you don't. You reload the server, not restart it. Restarting a web server should only be required if you get an upgrade for it (or for OpenSSL etc.)

Re:Let's Encrypt is down by sleepychu on Friday May 19, 2017 @10:42AM (#14376078)
OK, there's a 0-day patch for OpenSSL, without it my users are vulnerable to RCE. Why can't I restart if LE's ACME is down?
Re:Let's Encrypt is down by e_d_e_v on Friday May 19, 2017 @10:38AM (#14376043)
This goes wholly against most cattle-not-pets devops philosophy though, right?
Re:Let's Encrypt is down by eropple on Friday May 19, 2017 @10:48AM (#14376144)
How so? In Chef:

   notifies :reload, "service[caddy]", :delayed
Re:Let's Encrypt is down by e_d_e_v on Friday May 19, 2017 @11:14AM (#14376461)
The idea here is that the server can't be scaled up or down. I suggest googling "cattle vs pets". If you know how to make a single process scale horizontally across additional hosts or scale up in alternative datacenters with a chef service notification, I'd pay you money to tell me how.
Re:Let's Encrypt is down by eropple on Friday May 19, 2017 @01:39PM (#14377835)
So, um: devops and cloud architecture is my job. I think I know what "cattle vs pets" is referring to. Nothing in this thread has anything to do with one versus many processes or one versus many nodes, nor does it have anything to do with manual configuration of anything. Rewrite the configuration based in orchestration data or, in extremity, upload a new version of a cookbook that handles that new site; the hypothetical sixth site is added and the service kicked over without human interaction. Scaling is an orthogonal concern.