News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sweden drops Julian Assange rape investigation by toyg on Friday May 19, 2017 @07:57AM (#14374729)
As you say, this is not a simple criminal case - criminals don't broadcast their location when skipping bail. So you have to deal with it politically. A reasonable government would have done that a long time ago, getting Sweden to change its stance sooner (as it eventually happened anyway, like most people asked for and predicted, since it had been done before). Once that is sorted, you can liquidate it all as "a big misunderstanding" without losing face.

Unfortunately now it's very late, and I find it hard to believe the person responsible for this stupid position in the first place, currently leading the country, will do anything smart to resolve this for good.

Re:Sweden drops Julian Assange rape investigation by PJDK on Friday May 19, 2017 @08:35AM (#14374967)
So a politically significant person should be able to leverage their celebrity and status to avoid a rape charge?
Re:Sweden drops Julian Assange rape investigation by glenstein on Friday May 19, 2017 @11:26AM (#14376578)
I don't see how that even comes close to being a good faith reading of toyg's point. Assange's "celebrity", to the extent that we can even use a term like that to describe him in this context, flows from the political controversy surrounding him. Calling it celebrity abstracts away the political nature of Assange's status which is critical to any consideration of the charges against him.

No one is suggesting that a celebrity like Drake could apply for political asylum at an Ecuadorian embassy to avoid rape charges. But if that's what you're taking away from the argument it's probably worth reading it again and engaging with more good faith.