News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let them paste passwords by sowbug on Thursday May 18, 2017 @09:39AM (#14367065)
I also worry when a site doesn't work with autocomplete. It's rare these days that the developers have actively tried to prevent it from working, but more common that an unnecessarily intricate sign-in flow makes the existence of the password field unrecognizable to the browser.

This makes me wonder about the personal security practices of the team that built it -- it's unlikely they typed strong passphrases hundreds of times a day during development -- and whether a secure site could come from such a team.

Re:Let them paste passwords by Tobani on Thursday May 18, 2017 @10:07AM (#14367297)
There are a couple of reasons to actively prevent autofill passwords. The only one I have seen for login autofill prevention is when the password is actually a generated token (ala yubikey,etc) and a password manager won't do the right thing by default.

There are regulatory bodies that require regular challenge of user identity for approving items as sort of a signature mechanism. This is another time where active thwarting the password manager makes sense. Whether or not the regulation makes sense is an entirely different issue.

Re:Let them paste passwords by sowbug on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @07:19PM (#14406308)
Those are good reasons, and I appreciate when the attribute is used properly in these cases. It's annoying to have to say "no, don't remember this updated password" to my browser every single time I visit certain sites that ask for OTPs that my browser wants to autofill.

In the token case, I wonder whether they should have been password fields to begin with. Replacing a 6-digit OTP with asterisks is of questionable benefit, because the shoulder-surfer it thwarts can't reuse the OTP and is really unlikely to swipe it and use it before you do.