News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Colo hosting cheaper than high-end VPS, so why VPS? by jread on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @02:29PM (#1436512)
I agree it is cheaper (I have a full cabinet of hardware co-located myself), but at the expense of being on call 24x7x365. Although hardware is generally reliable, it can and does fail. Do you want to be the guy dealing with the burned out power supply at 3AM?
Re:Ask HN: Colo hosting cheaper than high-end VPS, so why VPS? by tworats on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @03:11PM (#1436653)
I definitely don't want to be the guy getting the 3AM call, but I don't see how going with a VPS saves me from that. Our approach is to have a semi-hot backup with semi-automated fail-over (hopefully fully automated in the future).

Using a VPS simply gives you the ability to get a new server up and running quickly. You'll still get the 3AM call unless you have automated fail-over.

Re:Ask HN: Colo hosting cheaper than high-end VPS, so why VPS? by jread on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @03:29PM (#1436720)
Usually a good outsourced provider will have measures in place to monitor and pro-actively deal with hardware failures as well as maintain standbys and replacement parts onsite. My point is simply that by outsourcing you don't have to deal with those issues. You might still get the call, but your provider should already be working on a fix.