Re:Apple Plans MacBook And MacBook Pro Kaby Lake Refresh For...
by framerate on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @11:39AM
(#14359505)
Bloomberg reported it: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-16/apple-sai...
Re:Apple Plans MacBook And MacBook Pro Kaby Lake Refresh For...
by danjoc on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @12:18PM
(#14359935)
>>big name
>Bloomberg
I stand by my post. Bloomberg spams HN for traffic. They don't get inside scoops from Apple.
Re:Apple Plans MacBook And MacBook Pro Kaby Lake Refresh For...
by fred256 on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @03:50PM
(#14362194)
The article was written by Mark Gurman who had an excellent rumor track record when he was at 9to5mac.
Re:Apple Plans MacBook And MacBook Pro Kaby Lake Refresh For...
by xsam on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @11:43AM
(#14359553)
Bloomberg was the source
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-16/apple-sai...
Re:Apple Plans MacBook And MacBook Pro Kaby Lake Refresh For...
by k-mcgrady on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @11:31AM
(#14359424)
If the WSJ etc. does have a version to test they're most likely banned from talking about it (inc. rumours).
Re:Apple Plans MacBook And MacBook Pro Kaby Lake Refresh For...
by schappim on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @11:37AM
(#14359488)
I think the OP is referring to the precisely timed leaks by Apple PR.
These are the articles with the words: "unnamed sources within Apple...".
An example of this was leaking the lack of 3.5mm earphone jack a year ahead so when it was launched the lack of the jack was old news, and not th focus of the news.
https://www.wsj.com/news/technology
Not one mention of Apple anywhere.*
*laptops