News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A startup’s Firebase bill suddenly increased from $25 to ... by mseebach on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @11:11AM (#14359195)
Sure, but that's just not what we're discussing here. The author of the original article clearly authorised the increased spend (but obviously not the sudden change causing it), and could have declined (presumably at the cost of having his app throttled or shut down). Nothing about a "cloud only card" would have changed his situation the least.
Re:A startup’s Firebase bill suddenly increased from $25 to ... by corford on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @11:19AM (#14359286)
Totally agree. If he/she authorised it after being given an opportunity to decline then, yes, it's absolutely on them. /me clearly didn't read the article ;)