News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Texas, here we come: Migration to the lone star state by njharman on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @11:46AM (#1435896)
> High earning New Yorkers and Californians can take home between 9% and 11% more of their income by moving to Texas

Wages in Austin are significantly less than San Francisco or Seattle and I suspect NY too. Don't kid yourselves you will be bringing home less money. Sales and property taxes are high too. But considering costs esp housing it's probably a net gain.

I wish I could recommend you not come to Austin (because influx of peoples will change what Austin is) But I can't cause Austin flippin rocks. [qualifications for judgment include; 3yrs Austin, 14yrs SF, 3yrs Seattle, many months in SoCal, Phoenix, Baltimore, Toronto, Melborne, all over Germany, Prague, Bangkok]

Re:Texas, here we come: Migration to the lone star state by enjo on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @12:22PM (#1436017)
I left Austin for Denver. Two pretty similar cities but (for me at least) Denver has a much nicer climate, with even more to do nearby. While there is a (low) state income tax, property taxes are MUCH lower. We pay a bit less in Taxes than when we lived in Texas overall. I also much prefer the neighborhoods in Boulder/Denver to what Austin has to offer.

Here is a nice chart with effective tax rates measured various ways:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_tax_levels_in_the_United_...

Re:Texas, here we come: Migration to the lone star state by natrius on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @01:26PM (#1436278)
On average, moving from San Francisco to Austin will considerably increase your disposable income.

http://swz.salary.com/costoflivingwizard/layoutscripts/coll_...

Re:Texas, here we come: Migration to the lone star state by exit on Wednesday June 16, 2010 @12:07PM (#1435966)
so since you reject the articles financial argument, what is it you find "flippin rocks" about austin?
Re:Texas, here we come: Migration to the lone star state by njharman on Thursday June 17, 2010 @10:59AM (#1439096)
> But considering costs esp housing it's probably a net gain.