Re:Chelsea Manning Is Expected to Leave Prison, 28 Years Early
by jakeogh on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @03:50PM
(#14362192)
You could find out plenty about that island on the net without actually visiting it if you wanted to.
Also, you brought her up, and are mass pasting when you could just link, yet not a word about the island.
Re:Chelsea Manning Is Expected to Leave Prison, 28 Years Early
by pavlov on Thursday May 18, 2017 @04:14AM
(#14365613)
Also, you brought her up ...
No, you did. You posted a Wikileaks link to an email sent by her, and you didn't explain why it's relevant.
Re:Chelsea Manning Is Expected to Leave Prison, 28 Years Early
by jakeogh on Thursday May 18, 2017 @06:32AM
(#14366117)
O ya, it was sent by her. Small world ay?
It's not a bit surprising to most people to see Clinton's folk get excited about a dinner with _that_ ritual. I mean, heck, everyone knows that's completely normal right? (I would rather not post her demo video, but it's on yt).
And it's perfectly normal for Bill (and?) to be visiting the unmentionable island.
How about Tony Podesta's taste in art? Totally normal right? (I _really_ cant post that here out of respect for basic norms, I recommend not googling it if you don't want see some extra creepy shit).
Re:Chelsea Manning Is Expected to Leave Prison, 28 Years Early
by dom0 on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @09:54AM
(#14358417)
Could you maybe re-wrap that quote? You're making the page like 2000 pixels wide.
Re:Chelsea Manning Is Expected to Leave Prison, 28 Years Early
by pavlov on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @11:51AM
(#14359648)
Sorry, I can't edit the post anymore. (HN's monospace formatting still mystifies me. I thought there is a 'max-width' style on those blocks? At least on mobile it doesn't break the entire page...)
I guess I was offended that Marina Abramovic is dragged into this on the flimsiest of evidence. She is one of the leading artists in the world, and this kind of malicious gossip is the complete opposite of the radical openness and self-consciousness that she lives through her work.
That's probably why this character assassination feels personal: if it can happen to her, it can happen to anyone.
> You made it clear you don't know the who what or where on subjects I suggested are pretty basic and related, yet you seem sure you are informed. If you want to know more, you could. It's not something anyone can effectively research in an evening unless you want to just dismiss it.
Here's the thing though: it's not something anyone can effectively research over the Internet -- full stop!
Edgar Welch, the Pizzagate gunman who drove to Washington to investigate the Comet restaurant, believed he had done deep research on this. His family said to reporters that he spent months obsessing about it. One day, he had enough. This is what happened next:
(Quoted from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/25/comet-ping-p...)Do you think Welch was well-informed by Internet research?