Nearly 1 in 3 drugs have a significant safety issue after FDA approval

Re:Nearly 1 in 3 drugs have a significant safety issue after... by cancelNYTimes on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @04:54AM (#14348266)

Yes, this is why I cancelled my New York Times subscription, and have been recommending everyone else do as well. They are now in the business of publishing climate denial propaganda for profit. Don't support it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nearly 1 in 3 drugs have a significant safety issue after... by pas on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @06:13AM (#14348519)

Can you expand on this? Links? Sources? What did they publish that was climate change denialism?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nearly 1 in 3 drugs have a significant safety issue after... by lr4444lr on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @08:34AM (#14349039)

They published an op-ed from Bret Stephens[0] that was largely focused on criticizing the elite's hubristic over-reliance on probabilistic data models as a justification for not dignifying skepticism of less well-informed people. It was construed as a promotion of climate change denialist FUD. That charge was fair to make, but a certain subset of people prone to dramatic gestures figured unsubscribing was the appropriate response, as if the NYTimes had never pushed politically biased interests before.

[0]https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/28/opinion/climate-of-comple...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nearly 1 in 3 drugs have a significant safety issue after... by pas on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @11:15AM (#14350219)

Thanks!

[ Parent | on HN ]