Re:SQL is 43 years old – Here’s why we still use it today
by Jweb_Guru on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @12:14AM
(#14347313)
I highly doubt your "close to the metal" solutions outperform state-of-the-art relational databases like EmptyHeaded. The truth is that people prefer to reinvent their own inferior solutions rather than looking for best-in-class stuff.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.