News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Two years of Rust by steveklabnik on Monday May 15, 2017 @07:48PM (#14346232)
> such as making cached precompiled libraries very easy to use.

This is already true today; that is, this cost is only paid the first time you compile. It's still not fast enough for people.

On my machine, a fresh build of rustc takes an hour, and small changes take 20 minutes, and even that makes it a giant pain. It's an ergonomic thing, IMO.

Re:Two years of Rust by bluejekyll on Monday May 15, 2017 @08:32PM (#14346475)
I should have been more clear; I mean a solution for many devs to pull precompiled caches, and share those for the same version of libraries... this would also benefit CI, as all CI runs to be based off this.
Re:Two years of Rust by kibwen on Monday May 15, 2017 @07:55PM (#14346262)
> a fresh build of rustc takes an hour

A bit influenced by the fact that rustc has to compile itself three times. :P

Re:Two years of Rust by steveklabnik on Monday May 15, 2017 @08:26PM (#14346437)
Sure, but as with all end-user stuff, I don't care what it has to do, just that it has to do it.