Dangerous Skyscrapers Channel Wind and Sun, Topple Pedestrians and Start Fires

Re:Dangerous Skyscrapers Channel Wind and Sun, Topple Pedest... by Gravityloss on Monday May 15, 2017 @02:41PM (#14343988)

That's fascinating. I've always wished my city had things like these. Trees would be nice, but they grow slowly and just when they start being big enough to thrive, look good and be useful, some official decides they're dangerous or happen to be exactly on top of a new roadway. So I guess a cold dead mechanical tree is the best we could get.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dangerous Skyscrapers Channel Wind and Sun, Topple Pedest... by pm90 on Monday May 15, 2017 @02:59PM (#14344158)

I wonder if this may be because of the weather, but why can't you grow vines on the metal trees to make it "green"? Or some sort of wall hugging vegetation. I mean, sure its not the same as a tree, but at least it might look nicer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dangerous Skyscrapers Channel Wind and Sun, Topple Pedest... by bluehawk on Monday May 15, 2017 @03:18PM (#14344308)

My guess is that the vanes on the top do something to disrupt the wind and stop it from reaching street level at such high speeds. The vines growing between the vanes could prevent this effect from happening.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dangerous Skyscrapers Channel Wind and Sun, Topple Pedest... by smnrchrds on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @12:23AM (#14347340)

I am not sure vines can survive Calgary winter.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dangerous Skyscrapers Channel Wind and Sun, Topple Pedest... by microcolonel on Monday May 15, 2017 @09:09PM (#14346637)

Trees are also not as strong as steel, and Calgary has fairly intense winters (as far as populated parts of North America go).

[ Parent | on HN ]