News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by mcherm on Sunday May 14, 2017 @09:47PM (#14338581)
> Anyone who thinks that these bodies ever change their mind due to the public comment periods is gullible.

It happened less than 2 years ago, on the topic of Net Neutrality. Remember? Tom Wheeler who was a known opponent of Net Neutrality? And the amazing flood of comments CHANGED HIS MIND?

Quit spouting off about how it's hopeless to change anything, and instead GO START REACHING OUT TO YOUR GOVERNMENT. (Your suggestion of calling congresspeople is a good one.)

Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by dragonwriter on Sunday May 14, 2017 @10:00PM (#14338629)
> Tom Wheeler who was a known opponent of Net Neutrality?

Tom Wheeler was a supporter of net neutrality from his first day on the commission. The FCC majority he led didn't initially see common carrier classification as the best route to enforce neutrality after the 2010 Open Internet Order was struck down, and proposed a revised Order which sought to do that without reclassification, and on that point the comments changed his mind. But that's different than being opponent to neutrality regulations like Pai has been (and Pai was on the committee, and opposed to both the non-reclassifying and reclassifying version of the Open Internet Order, at the time of the last go around; if comments were going to change his mind, they already would have.)

Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by unityByFreedom on Monday May 15, 2017 @05:04AM (#14340168)
Ehh, he supported internet fast lanes. Not so different in my opinion.

Anyway the GP's point is that comments changed his mind, not that Wheeler and Pai thought exactly alike.

Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by dragonwriter on Monday May 15, 2017 @09:08AM (#14341237)
> Ehh, he supported internet fast lanes.

No, he didn't.

Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by unityByFreedom on Monday May 15, 2017 @09:59AM (#14341614)
Yes, he did

> "F.C.C., in a Shift, Backs Fast Lanes for Web Traffic " ... The proposed rules, drafted by Mr. Wheeler and his staff ... [1]

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-ne...

Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by vorotato on Tuesday May 16, 2017 @02:39PM (#14352121)
Yeah the support for gutting net neutrality has been bipartisan by politicians, and the opposition has been bipartisan by the people. Anyone who supports gutting net neutrality is either a sucker or bought.
[dead]
Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by deadbunny on Monday May 15, 2017 @05:01AM (#14340151)
Isn't this the exact reason Americans give for having their right to bear arms? Why is there not an armed revolution against the clearly corrupt government?
Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by unityByFreedom on Monday May 15, 2017 @05:09AM (#14340177)
Because that's ridiculous and exactly what foreign adversaries would love to see as a result of the currently tense political environment.

Plus, violent protesters almost never come out looking good. Any violence coming from the left would just entrench the powers of the right.

There are a few exceptions, like the revolutionary war. But, that's a time when American people were separated by great distance from its governing body. Revolution doesn't work when you're connected by land. Some foreign power would just take advantage of our weakness, and all Americans would lose.

We need to find a way to work together.

Re:FCC Filings Overwhelmingly Support Net Neutrality Once Sp... by cookiecaper on Monday May 15, 2017 @01:20PM (#14343306)
People usually need to anticipate a lot of hardship/uncertainty before they're willing to get into a war. De-prioritizing Netflix traffic doesn't really fit the bill.

These issues are much more sophisticated than many people appreciate. Democrat and Republican, all FCC commissioners have a telecom industry background, which causes everyone to posit that they have a bias toward their former employers. But how can you be expected to regulate the telecom industry if you have no idea how it works? How do you establish that someone knows what they're doing if they don't have an industry background? There are a lot of complexities here.

That's why our system of checks and balances is so important; it puts clear constraints on the powers of each segment, making it so no segment can get too much control. FCC is an executive-branch enforcement body; it can only do what Congress allows it to do.

Congress is at the heart of the governmental ineffectualness in the US. Fixing Congress would take care of most of our other problems.