* Communal (worker) ownership of the means of production (land and machinery used to make goods for society)
* Government composed entirely of the workers, making decisions in the interest of the workers
* Goods are produced to be used rather than exchanged on a market
* Wage labour is not dominant in the economy
* The functions of private property have been abolished and thus there is no more private property.
Venezuela fails all of these criteria. It's not "no true Scotsman", it's the truth.
Someone called Angus, who calls himself a Scotsman, but who doesn't have Scottish citizenship, nationality, lineage nor has he ever lived in Scotland is not a Scotsman.
As far as Venezuela is concerned, the current government do see themselves as socialist (the Bolivarian revolution).
¡El unico camino para salvar el mundo es el socialismo | The only way to save the world is socialism! — Hugo Chavez
A few links:
https://venezuelanalysis.com/ http://www.correodelorinoco.gob.ve/
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
>As far as Venezuela is concerned, the current government do see themselves as socialist (the Bolivarian revolution).
As I said, just because his name is Angus and he calls himself a Scotsman, it does not make him so. The DPRK calls itself democratic, too. Are we to hold it as the exemplar democracy, and claim that democracy is such a failure?
Usually the answer would be? The rules. Who applies the rules? The machine. Who made the machine? The party. Who rules the party? Most ruthless psycho-dick ever. Thus its profen that communism, basically is one big cooperation ruling the earth, and shall forth be called googlnism.
I really hate such discussions, they are so pointless, because they look at the state they want society to be in and just erect a cathedral.
While we should look at all the various failing members of society, catograph what is human, and from that we might be able to build a hut that is able to stand a thousand years.