News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Waymo’s lawsuit against Uber is going to trial, judge rules by joshuamorton on Saturday May 13, 2017 @10:44PM (#14333976)
>I agree on the first and third milestones. Or kinda -- perhaps the first milestone is only reached for California, or for US highways yet

My anecdotal experience shows that there exist vehicles capable of tooling around on highways and city streets without the need for human interaction.

>but from a I'd-like-to-arrive-at-some-point perspective. Because then again it becomes about human interaction (being assertive without being an asshole, muddling your way through this blocked intersection through essentially non-verbal communication with the drivers around you), and computers will (inherently, perhaps) be worse at that than humans.

There's a good video I've seen about how the Google cars can increase their assertiveness until they can go.

>Except, again, that humans will be able to judge body language or the rules of a game the children are playing, and anticipate instead of being confined to reacting

Not if they can't see the children because, as I said, they're behind trees.

>Perhaps my pessimism also stems from the fact that the oh-so-smart driving assistants in my car are so shitty

Indeed, that's why I clarify that Adaptive Cruise Control isn't the same thing as an autonomous vehicle and you shouldn't use one to judge the other.

There are no comments on this comment yet.