News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel releases the last Itanium chip, the 9700 by deepnotderp on Saturday May 13, 2017 @05:08PM (#14333035)
It's less of a miracle and more like "larger OoO window, K done"
Re:Intel releases the last Itanium chip, the 9700 by bonzini on Sunday May 14, 2017 @09:04AM (#14335454)
No, that's not so easy.

You cannot fill that out-of-order window if you mispredict branches. So the branch prediction has gotten better and better, to an absurd level of accuracy.

You also need more execution units, to accommodate more kinds of serial code without stalling the pipeline. In Skylake they also improved the retirement unit, apparently to improve hyperthreading performance.

There are also better prefetchers and decoders, while the decoders also become more complicated because this is good old x86's variable-length encoding, with further complications for x86-64, AVX, and so on.

TLBs also get more complex (there have been two-level TLBs for a while now), though I guess that is part of the "bigger caches" part.

Re:Intel releases the last Itanium chip, the 9700 by deepnotderp on Sunday May 14, 2017 @03:03PM (#14337021)
I agree, I was being a little blunt, but it's not necessarily as complicated as people make it out to be. The best branch predictor is once again the perceptron, and it beats current Intel chips on benchmarks. (I would hazard a, guess that Intel uses something like the tage predictor)