Re:I spent two weeks delivering for Uber Eats and made $4.40...
by eru on Saturday May 13, 2017 @08:20AM
(#14330578)
If that dynamic worked, why isn't McDonald's (or so) the only restaurant left?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I spent two weeks delivering for Uber Eats and made $4.40...
by adtac on Saturday May 13, 2017 @08:26AM
(#14330613)
Because they are regulated. A job at McDonalds is an actual hourly wage job regulated by the government.
Re:I spent two weeks delivering for Uber Eats and made $4.40...
by eru on Saturday May 13, 2017 @09:01AM
(#14330727)
Did you know that the US is not the only country in the world?
Re:I spent two weeks delivering for Uber Eats and made $4.40...
by adtac on Saturday May 13, 2017 @09:06AM
(#14330749)
I'm not from the US, never been there. But I thought the context here was obvious. Even still, it's regulated in almost all countries.
Re:I spent two weeks delivering for Uber Eats and made $4.40...
by eru on Saturday May 13, 2017 @09:15AM
(#14330797)
I was thinking about Singapore, which pays as little as 2.50 SGD/h at McDonald's, yet has a thriving food scene. (And, yes, they have plenty of regulations eg about food safety. But no minimum wage.)
In any case, perhaps a faulty analogy. But your claim "[...] when Uber undercuts competitors by a large margin using inhumane practices, the competitors tend to vanish over time. In the end, guess who is your only choice." doesn't hold up at all.
Re:I spent two weeks delivering for Uber Eats and made $4.40...
by adultSwim on Saturday May 13, 2017 @10:54AM
(#14331267)
Whoa there, grandpa. Don't box me in. I can't be weighed down with health insurance much less a stable income that I can plan around. Pfft, next thing you know I'll be able to retire when I'm old.