Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by Retra on Saturday May 13, 2017 @11:58AM
(#14331575)
Well, I seem to have no trouble practicing all of those, so I know they are based on fact. Perhaps you don't actually understand what I'm talking about? Or maybe your experiences differ. Either way, telling me the things that that I personally do are not being done is... not an argument.
>>the de jure "reasonable expectation of privacy" > Does not protect your exposed face
Yeah, that's why it is "reasonable expectations" not "absolute enforcement."
Does not protect your exposed face
>the de facto privacies of anonymity, free association, and predictable rules of social engagement
Are outdated illusions with no basis in fact