News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by bogle on Friday May 12, 2017 @08:47AM (#14323486)
2-bit operation folds, fine unpaid. Director and his missus (1 share each) walk away unscathed.
Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by tgb on Friday May 12, 2017 @08:59AM (#14323577)
> In October, the government announced plans to let the ICO fine company directors as well as their businesses. "Making directors responsible will stop them avoiding fines by putting their company into liquidation," the ICO said.

Can't come soon enough!

Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by digitalronin on Friday May 12, 2017 @08:59AM (#14323580)
Not necessarily;

> From Spring 2017, firm directors can each be fined up to £500,000 by the Information Commissioner’s Office, if they are found to be in breach of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-clamps-down-on...

Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by DanBC on Friday May 12, 2017 @08:59AM (#14323576)
Directors are personally liable for ICO fines as a result of PECR infringement.

At least, that was the plan, I'm not sure if this was enacted: http://www.wablegal.com/uk-directors-personally-liable-nuisa...

Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by bogle on Friday May 12, 2017 @09:29AM (#14323768)
Nope, not enacted and now kicked into the long grass.
Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by victorNicollet on Friday May 12, 2017 @08:58AM (#14323566)
> In October, the government announced plans to let the ICO fine company directors as well as their businesses.
Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by _pmf_ on Friday May 12, 2017 @10:20AM (#14324127)
The magic of limited liability. It's the codified concept of privatizing profits and socializing losses.
Re:Nuisance call firm Keurboom hit with record fine by easytiger on Friday May 12, 2017 @11:40AM (#14324954)
It really is not