How Australia Bungled Its $36B High-Speed Internet Rollout

Re:How Australia Bungled Its $36B High-Speed Internet Rollout by benjoffe on Friday May 12, 2017 @04:51AM (#14322382)

Which parts of the constitution do you think are bad?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Australia Bungled Its $36B High-Speed Internet Rollout by fit2rule on Sunday May 14, 2017 @04:49AM (#14334839)

You can get started here:

https://independentaustralia.net/australia/australia-display...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Australia Bungled Its $36B High-Speed Internet Rollout by eng_monkey on Friday May 12, 2017 @05:20AM (#14322481)

E.g. it does not explicitly outline the right to freedom of expression. It is sort of implied within Government, but not necessarily.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Australia Bungled Its $36B High-Speed Internet Rollout by ue_ on Friday May 12, 2017 @05:53AM (#14322623)

I don't know if it is related to the constitutional issue, but someone was convicted of having Simposons pornography because it pictured child characters from the show.

The UK, Canada, NZ etc. and otger countries (to a weaker extent) have similar laws. It is ridiculous in my view.

[ Parent | on HN ]