Re:NYU Accidentally Exposed Military Code-Breaking Computer
by tptacek on Thursday May 11, 2017 @03:48PM
(#14318914)
Sorry, I meant "conceivable conventional computer" but forgot the extra word (I'd used it elsewhere on the thread).
If this was some crazy undocumented advance in quantum computing, I'd have written a different comment. But it's not: it's high end conventional computing, which absent some fundamental break in the integer factorization problem (in which case that break would be the story, not the supercomputer) isn't going to make a dent in RSA.
(I'm a QC skeptic, for what it's worth.)
I'm sure you know about quantum computers. So what am I missing here? Surely they are a conceivable computer with a practical realization some decades away.