Do Uber drivers even have an expectation to earn a minimum wage? But to answer your question, yes, I do avoid stores and businesses that are known to treat their employees poorly and e.g. block unionization.

As for "Uber drivers can just quit", I think that's a very simplistic argument. Uber are pricing competitors out of the market (using venture capital!), turning what used to be a fairly decent job into something that's barely enough to scrape by on. The people likely to driver for Uber likely don't have as many options, and probably fewer by the day as jobs that don't require are lot of skills are increasingly being turned into temporary jobs and platform gigs. I'm from Scandinavia, which has a very high degree of social cohesion and low economic inequality, and I see it very mch as a regression and a danger to society.

> turning what used to be a fairly decent job into something that's barely enough to scrape by on

That hasn't been true in the US. In NYC Uber drivers make $30/hr and don't have to work under the existing exploitative Taxi system where they could actually lose money on an unprofitable day. Also, Uber has brought car service to smaller cities (e.g. Mountain View) where there used to be no Taxi system at all (in fact airport taxis would price gouge you for going SFO -> South Bay). Maybe Europe is different but I don't think you can make blanket statements like that.

Yeap. Here's NYT report from '95 (so, way too early to be a PR piece for Uber):

"Driving a Taxi, Difficult in Best of Times, Gets Tougher"

http://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/09/nyregion/driving-a-taxi-di...

Granted, I can only speak from the perspective of my own country.

Well nothing prevents it. [1] In fact they do. The churn rate for Uber is insane. They sign people up and wait for them to realize that after hidden costs (like depreciation and repair) they aren't making much money at all. They are mostly monetizing people's inability to account for expenses.

[1] well some of their car lease deals seem sorta like locking people people in. But I don't know enough about them.

One of the things preventing an Uber driver from just quitting is that Uber drives down price expecations across the board, and so makes it harder for others to pay their drivers a reasonable wage.

You might think that's ok, but in societies where we have agreed that having people go without healthcare or housing, or letting people starve is unacceptable, predatory employers end up in effect subsidised by the state, and those subsidies hurt both tax payers and more ethically run competitors.

Here's an example:

https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2015/04/24/one-uber-drivers-story-...

This part in particular:

> When Brunelle got home, he realized he had signed a loan with a 22.75 percent interest rate. That means he will end up paying around $49,000 on a Kia Optima that normally retails for about $25,000.

Which is beyond scandalous when Uber are also trying to do self driving cars ASAP and remove the need for drivers entirely.

It really makes me question the morals of the person or people who signed off on both of these.

Edit: I mean, the loans are terrible enough, and then they try to make the same drivers redundant? Disgraceful.

But it's so _convenient_ and something something Taxi cartel!

Perhaps those people are unemployed, and all they need to be an Uber driver is a driver's license and a car?

Another likely possibility is that people often think their cost to drive someone is just gas ignoring cost of of car registration, insurance, car maintenance etc. Ignoring other costs the Uber's pay seem attractive.