Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by BeniBoy on Thursday May 11, 2017 @07:30AM
(#14315246)
Indeed you can, from a disposable camera flash circuit[1]!
Though I concur, might be used for evil purposes, couldn't resist posting this. I just love disposable cameras hacks.
[1]:https://events.ccc.de/congress/2005/static/r/f/i/RFID-Zapper...
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by i336_ on Thursday May 11, 2017 @07:42AM
(#14315297)
Ah, very interesting. Thanks for the link.
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by phkahler on Thursday May 11, 2017 @07:21AM
(#14315218)
>> Well this is annoyingly difficult to discuss, then...
Why? Is there a law against public discussion about how to disable an anti-theft device or something?
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by i336_ on Thursday May 11, 2017 @07:42AM
(#14315294)
Okay, not really - but it can be tricky to know where to draw the line. I guess I was uncertain.
Re:A crashed advertisement reveals logs of a facial recognit...
by kebman on Thursday May 11, 2017 @08:03AM
(#14315381)
I draw the line where actions are taken. A discussion is not an action. Using a device illegally is, like for instance pulling the trigger of a gun with the evil intent of murder, or taking something that isn't yours.
I'm not sure if the same can be done to tags, but considering the size of the tiny electronics, and the fact that they are manufactured under the assumption they'll never need to be touched (aka, no CMOS spike tolerance), it might be trivially...
...wait. I just remembered about RFID alarm barriers in retail stores.
Well this is annoyingly difficult to discuss, then...