News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Azure Cosmos DB, a globally distributed database. Parent comment

Re:Azure Cosmos DB, a globally distributed database by martinknafve on Thursday May 11, 2017 @03:14AM (#14314331)
Actually, I wish Microsoft would stop referring to replication when asked about backup. It's the modern way of saying "You probably don't need backup, because you have RAID". There's a reason Azure SQL Database has self-service point-in-time-recovery despite also having replication.

Do you see many use cases where there is no need for backup to protect against accidental deletion, overwriting, deletion by application vulnerabilities and so on?

As far as I understood the backup docs, I should contact Microsoft Support within 8 hours if any of those things happens. Is that still correct? What if we don't notice the issue until 7 days later?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Azure Cosmos DB, a globally distributed database by Ecio78 on Thursday May 11, 2017 @05:49AM (#14314887)
Totally agree with you. Even if you have delayed copies, you still need proper backup in place. They recently implemented long term retention for Azure SQL backups in Azure: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-sql-database-no... as it was only allowing 'til 35 days. I would expect that something similar is provided also for this type of DBs
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Azure Cosmos DB, a globally distributed database by martinknafve on Thursday May 11, 2017 @10:44AM (#14316365)
One can hope. Blob and table storage still have no form of backup ~8 years after introduction.

When I've asked they have been referring to replication and to call them if we accidentally lose data. But we need to contact them within two hours otherwise it's too late. And of course Azure Support never responds that quickly when I submit a case to them.

[ Parent | on HN ]