News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snap Inc. Reports First Quarter 2017 Results by tuna-piano on Wednesday May 10, 2017 @07:11PM (#14312570)
Gotcha. I'm not sure it's a win-win, but it feels crazy to say that giving 0 free sites is better than giving Facebook free. It's a level playing field, sure, but consumers are worse off than if they had free access to Facebook.

In my opinion, opportunity is better than equality.

Re:Snap Inc. Reports First Quarter 2017 Results by amoorthy on Wednesday May 10, 2017 @07:37PM (#14312719)
A lot of people think this way, Zuck included, and that's what makes the decision in India so interesting and, at least for me, correct.

FB does not categorically improve the quality of life for its users. FB provides connectivity to others... this is good. But if the cost is making you think the world is askew from what it really is because all you see is what FB's feed shows you... well that's a steep price that nobody, even the poor, should be asked to pay.