News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CPU Utilization is Wrong by taeric on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @09:20PM (#14305238)
This is silly. The conceit that ipc is a simplification for "higher is better" is exactly the problem he has with utilization.

True, but useful? Most of us are busy trying to get writes across a networked service. Indeed, getting to 50% utilization is often a dangerous place.

For reference, running your car by focusing on rpm of the engine is silly. But, it is a very good proxy and even more silly to try and avoid it. Only if you are seriously instrumented is this a valid path. And getting that instrumented is not cheap or free.

Re:CPU Utilization is Wrong by IIIIIIIIIIII on Wednesday May 10, 2017 @02:37AM (#14306308)
This is a gross misrepresentation of the article. It is in your own head that he solely focuses on this one thing. When somebody says "this soup needs more salt" you start talking about how there always is too much salt in processed food these days? The article is a about a concrete narrow subject, not about "performance" (the entire field).

Can't some people read an article without extrapolating to the end of the known universe and just stick to just the article's actual narrow subject?

Re:CPU Utilization is Wrong by taeric on Wednesday May 10, 2017 @10:11AM (#14308291)
Take my criticism as being on the chosen title and framing.

It is a neat subject. Just as knowing different ways of measuring car utilization and power transfer. Framing it as a take down of how people commonly do it is extreme and at major risk of throwing out the baby with the bath water.