News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uncensorable Wikipedia on IPFS by oh_sigh on Monday May 08, 2017 @03:49PM (#14294933)
So China blocked github, and then eventually relented because it was too useful for people in China. Why wouldn't the same thing possibly happen to IPFS?
Re:Uncensorable Wikipedia on IPFS by tormeh on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @05:17PM (#14303881)
Because it's not useful? Make IPFS useful - only then can it be used against censorship. Otherwise it ends up like Tor: Something governments can block without consequence.
Re:Uncensorable Wikipedia on IPFS by inimino on Monday May 08, 2017 @11:53PM (#14297618)
Because IPFS is useless at the moment compared to something like github.
Re:Uncensorable Wikipedia on IPFS by bigbugbag on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @06:06AM (#14298808)
Maybe you have an example of how IPFS could so useful to China that it would revert a block, but it seems to me that the reason of existence and purpose of IPFS goes against the tide of Chinese governement preventing it from ever being useful to them.
Re:Uncensorable Wikipedia on IPFS by Qwertious on Tuesday May 09, 2017 @10:28AM (#14300266)
The government has limits on how much it can defy economics - if it inflicts too much unnecessary economic damage on its corporate powerbase, they'll go support other factions, who promise to rectify this.

Relevant CGP Grey video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs