Re:EPA dismisses half of its scientific advisers on key board
by jonathansizz on Monday May 08, 2017 @03:31AM
(#14289882)
> As far as I can tell, conservative viewpoint on climate change is varied, from 'the effects of man made climate change will be mild and not catastrophic' to 'golabal warming is caused by increased solar activity'
Unfortunately, that range lies outside what mainstream climate science has been telling us for decades.
Re:EPA dismisses half of its scientific advisers on key board
by afpx on Monday May 08, 2017 @03:34AM
(#14289888)
Your confidence in this administration's eagerness to fund scientific research is ... well, surprising. To me, at least.
But, are you confident enough in their willingness to continue unbiased scientific research into climate change that you would bet money on it? I am very interested in a friendly (but financially significant) wager now. :)
Re:EPA dismisses half of its scientific advisers on key board
by dwaltrip on Monday May 08, 2017 @04:22AM
(#14290036)
It's not solar activity. That has been debunked for a long time.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-glo...
Re:EPA dismisses half of its scientific advisers on key board
by defined on Monday May 08, 2017 @08:33AM
(#14290964)
We'll probably still be debating this as we row to work one day.
Re:EPA dismisses half of its scientific advisers on key board
by ricardobeat on Monday May 08, 2017 @03:18AM
(#14289841)
Or in short, "I'm hoping for the best".
The point I was making was that there is no reason to stir up hysteria just because you heard the words 'Republican' and 'EPA' in the same sentence