Re:EPA dismisses half of its scientific advisers on key board
by defined on Monday May 08, 2017 @02:40AM
(#14289698)
Peer review is meant to compensate for scientific bias (i.e. "yes-men"). This administration is reducing peer review. Therefore the new yes-men are worse than the old.
Re:EPA dismisses half of its scientific advisers on key board
by aaronbrethorst on Monday May 08, 2017 @02:32AM
(#14289673)
We are entitled to our own opinions, not our own facts. Scientific fact is not the exclusive domain of any political party. A question that's worth asking is: which political party is more interested in scientific fact when it comes to the climate?
As an independent, I question how this situation is much different from years past. It's just a different set of yes-men.