Re:Physiognomy’s New Clothes (on the Limits of AI)
by gwern on Sunday May 07, 2017 @10:34PM
(#14288870)
Yeah, this urban legend always gets trotted out to criticize neural networks, but after years of looking, I've never been able to confirm it, and even when Minsky tells it, he can't name any names or concrete details about when or where - for example, in Minsky's version, it was how the photographs were developed, but in yours, it's winter/summer, and in other versions, it's night vs day, or it was forest vs grass: http://lesswrong.com/lw/td/magical_categories/4v4a http://lesswrong.com/lw/lvh/examples_of_ais_behaving_badly/c...
Re:Physiognomy’s New Clothes (on the Limits of AI)
by mindviews on Monday May 08, 2017 @01:49AM
(#14289513)
And last week I heard that story but the difference was that the images of the NATO tanks were in perfect focus while the Soviet tanks were out of focus in the training images. Clearly this story is all over the place. I wonder if even the likely source is correct. https://www.webofstories.com/play/marvin.minsky/122
Turns out, all the pictures of Russian tanks were taken in the winter, while all the american ones were taken in the summer. All they had done was trained a model to classify how bright the picture was.