News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by Alex3917 on Sunday June 13, 2010 @11:27PM (#1428770)
"It's overwhelmingly better than being poor with an economy built primarily on the drug trade."

Not necessarily. The U.S. economy was built on drugs when it was starting out. Even today most of our famous colleges are named after drug families.

Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by jeffcoat on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:04AM (#1428843)
It would be interesting to see numbers on just how dependent the early American colonies were on tobacco exports. That's the sort of thing that would tend to be de-emphasized in low-level history textbooks.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by buss on Sunday June 13, 2010 @11:53PM (#1428827)
I have never heard this. Citation please?
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by aristus on Sunday June 13, 2010 @11:54PM (#1428828)
Ah, yes, Notorious M.I.T.

Which famous colleges do you have in mind here?

Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by Alex3917 on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:13AM (#1428862)
Yale, Brown, Duke, Kennedy School, Georgetown, Stanford, etc. Those are just a few I can think of off the top of my head, I'm sure there are at least another twenty.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by gruseom on Monday June 14, 2010 @03:01AM (#1429090)
Stanford made his money in railroads, not necessarily in the most seemly way, but hardly a drug. He did own wineries in Northern CA, but I was under the impression that those came much later. Are they what you were referring to?
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by Alex3917 on Monday June 14, 2010 @10:41AM (#1429779)
According to Wikipedia he owned the largest vineyard in the world.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by starkfist on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:34AM (#1428900)
They aren't "famous colleges" if you can't think of them off the top of your head.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by eru on Monday June 14, 2010 @08:48AM (#1429510)
Depends. By this metric -- applied to me -- there are no famous American-football players, either.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by joeyo on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:08AM (#1428855)
The only obvious one I can think of is Duke.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by starkfist on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:01AM (#1428839)
LOL. What?? The Puritans were drug mules? What on earth are you talking about?
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by Alex3917 on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:22AM (#1428881)
Tobacco, the triangle trade, opium, weed, etc. Several of the states actually had laws on the books that made it a criminal offense to not grow marijuana.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by JoeAltmaier on Monday June 14, 2010 @09:18AM (#1429584)
Yes, but hemp was used in industry to make rope, not smoked. Easy to make sensationalist remarks; a little responsible research takes time and trouble.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by Alex3917 on Monday June 14, 2010 @11:19AM (#1429899)
Regardless of whether or not it was smoked, industrial hemp is still considered a drug today. IIRC you're actually eligible for the death penalty if you grow enough of it.
Re:U.S. Discovers Est. $1 Trillion of Minerals in Afghanistan by starkfist on Monday June 14, 2010 @12:42AM (#1428917)
I was referring to "Even today most of our famous colleges are named after drug families"