Re:Limbo – A Reasoning System for First-Order Limited Belief
by crawfordcomeaux on Saturday May 06, 2017 @08:06PM
(#14283031)
If we were to start with this as the foundation for modeling human decisions, where does this fail as a model?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Limbo – A Reasoning System for First-Order Limited Belief
by dragonwriter on Saturday May 06, 2017 @08:31PM
(#14283149)
Its kind of hard to do the measurements necessary to answer that question without being able to accurately and objectively measure actual human beliefs (which may not be the same as self-reported beliefs.)
Re:Limbo – A Reasoning System for First-Order Limited Belief
by crawfordcomeaux on Sunday May 07, 2017 @02:33AM
(#14284196)
Ok. What about using inaccurate, subjective measures? How well does it model self-reported beliefs?
Re:Limbo – A Reasoning System for First-Order Limited Belief
by Lambdanaut on Sunday May 07, 2017 @12:06AM
(#14283792)
What resolution are you looking for? All models fail to be the thing they're modelling.
The first and obvious answer is that "this is software running on hardware, as apposed to being biologically-based".
It might sound like I'm being facetious but your question is really that broad.
Re:Limbo – A Reasoning System for First-Order Limited Belief
by drdeca on Sunday May 07, 2017 @12:37AM
(#14283890)
"What sort of predictions that this makes are contradicted by observation"?
Re:Limbo – A Reasoning System for First-Order Limited Belief
by crawfordcomeaux on Sunday May 07, 2017 @02:34AM
(#14284198)
This is what I meant. Thanks for providing the clarification I didn't think to include.