News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Rust Libs Blitz by hyperpape on Friday May 05, 2017 @04:11PM (#14276480)
It's unsafe in roughly the same way that Rust developers call C and C++ unsafe, right? The advantage is that it's a special, relatively uncommon mode, and it's explicitly marked. But I don't think you can minimize the reality that it's unsafe without also minimizing one of the major selling points of the language.
Re:The Rust Libs Blitz by epage on Friday May 05, 2017 @06:19PM (#14277215)
Because only 10% of your code isn't verified by the compiler but instead needs extra review and tests doesn't eliminate the benefit that 90% of your code is verified by the compiler.
Re:The Rust Libs Blitz by eximius on Friday May 05, 2017 @08:57PM (#14278017)
Unsafe blocks are typically as small as necessary, so the burden is small to perform extensive manual verification