Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade authorities

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by avar on Friday May 05, 2017 @05:36AM (#14272186)

I misphrased that, I shouldn't have said defense but when a defendant could expect leniency on that basis.

With that caveat my question still stands, `gotothedoctor` is , if I understand him correctly, saying that corporations like Uber can't expect that sort of leniency, but what about other not-quite-just-a-person entities?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by gotothedoctor on Friday May 05, 2017 @03:24PM (#14276127)

a business is a business and a person is a person. there are no "not quite a person entities" (those are businesses) and there are no technicalities here that transform an economic exchange into a personal one.

AKA: no, Ross is not Silk Road. And, yes, the Silk Road is a business that took in millions if not billions.

Simply put: when there is material benefit or an economic exchange, it is a business, whether you are selling lemonade, drugs, guns or even personal services. There is no loophole.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Uber faces criminal probe over software used to evade aut... by avar on Friday May 05, 2017 @04:26PM (#14276586)

Thanks for that clarification. When you said "companies" I thought you meant that in the sense of incorporated entities. But if it's just whether you're engaging in business or not that's pretty clear-cut.

[ Parent | on HN ]