News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FBI director Comey backs new Feinstein push for decrypt bill by BinaryIdiot on Thursday May 04, 2017 @06:12PM (#14269324)
> As I said, that distinction matters for Apple's spurious "compelled speech" argument.

It does not. Just because a government orders you to do something privately doesn't mean it isn't compelled speech. Regardless, see my reply to your other comment.

Re:FBI director Comey backs new Feinstein push for decrypt bill by lern_too_spel on Friday May 05, 2017 @10:47AM (#14273804)
> Just because a government orders you to do something privately doesn't mean it isn't compelled speech.

As I said earlier, the standard for illegal compelled​speech was defined in Wooley v. Maynard, prior to which there was no such thing as illegal compelled speech. Do you actually have an argument about why forcing the writing of unreleased software is illegal compelled speech, or are you going to keep saying it as a truism?