News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on SCOTUS Rejects Guilty Until Proven Innocent – Can't Keep Money from the Innocent. Parent comment

Re:SCOTUS Rejects Guilty Until Proven Innocent – Can't Keep ... by noahl on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @01:49PM (#14258246)
The legal system is different than code in a very important way: the law is written to be applied by intelligent people working (mostly) in good faith. This is why judges have discretion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_discretion), and also why tort law exists (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort).

The attitude in your comment, that the law should be interpreted with perfect strictness and machine-like lack of concern for obvious blunders, is in my opinion really hurting the United States today.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SCOTUS Rejects Guilty Until Proven Innocent – Can't Keep ... by jack9 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @03:37PM (#14259271)
> The legal system is different than code in a very important way: the law is written to be applied by intelligent people working (mostly) in good faith.

I disagree. Code is also designed that way. The humble admission and responsible actions to secure against abuse are the same. The difference is in the specific interpretation timings. Code is a priori deterministic and law is a posteriori deterministic, with exceptions on both sides (code environment or human interpretation changes).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SCOTUS Rejects Guilty Until Proven Innocent – Can't Keep ... by pierrebai on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @05:01PM (#14260050)
Í'd like to mention the good book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_of_the_Speluncean_Exp...

It delves into multiple possible stances regarding the nature of laws. I think Justice Thomas falls squarely into one of the explored stance.

PS: also, an extended version: https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/cse.htm (that's the one I have)

[ Parent | on HN ]