News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SQL is 43 years old – Here’s why we still use it today by nickpeterson on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @07:30AM (#14254777)
This is correct if I understand you. Basically, when people add something new to a schema, they're generally tacitly also admitting it's optional. Optional fields should not exist on the same table as non-optional fields, because then you have to allow everything to be null or a specially designated value.

There are no comments on this comment yet.