Re:Jeff Atwood on growing Discourse
by WhitneyLand on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:48AM
(#14256792)
You label that discussion as a rant, rather than honest questions about what Disourse users are asking for and architecture decisions? Wow.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/embed-discourse-comments-with-o...
I fully acknowledged the difficulty of your task, and tried to break down feed back into specific, actionable items.
Getting constructive criticism is not always fun, but it's part of our job. Besides that some people posting there are potential customers. Why call them ranters instead of a simple, we agree to disagree?
Re:Jeff Atwood on growing Discourse
by devopsproject on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @10:52AM
(#14256159)
> who to be frank seemed a little thin skinned
seems apt, lol
"I’ve started to research Discourse as a general solution and started with embed capabilities. To be frank the whole situation seems to be a bit of a mess."
To be frank, I would describe what you posted more as rants than actual discussions about features. You wanted Disqus and were pretty rude about it. That's not what we're building at Discourse. If you have a problem with that, sorry.