News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by DigitalJack on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @03:16AM (#14253667)
I think that objection is likely true of scheme. Scheme is like the Assembly language of lisps. To build it up to the level of usefulness requires a lot of wheel re-inventing, and those wheels are likely to be not quite standard.

Clojure and Common Lisp are larger languages and don't really suffer this problem.

Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by kazinator on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @09:19AM (#14255371)
However, mainstream machine languages have defined orders of evaluation and specified results.
Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by shakna on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @03:29AM (#14253713)
That's not really the case for R6RS, and now R7RS Large.

Both of those have huge swathes of libraries and make the language quite large.