Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by pnathan on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @11:50PM
(#14252898)
The South keeps coming off as racist/homophobic these days, constantly. So does a fair bit of the Midwest. I have this weird allergy to that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by dakrootie on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @12:43AM
(#14253093)
So I see you've learned everything you know about the South from TV/movies.
When you get a chance, visit (in person) Jacksonville, Savannah, Asheville, Charleston, Austin, Birmingham, Atlanta...and on and on. It's amazing how they're just like the other non-hateful cities from time to time.
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by greglindahl on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @01:10AM
(#14253210)
I grew up in the south, and it really hasn't changed.
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by WillPostForFood on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @01:40AM
(#14253322)
You are old enough to know better than that. No difference between Ivan Allen and Shirley Franklin?
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by greglindahl on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @01:50AM
(#14253360)
I am old enough to remember when Jeff Sessions was radioactive enough to not be confirmed by the US Senate. What more needs to be said?
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by WillPostForFood on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @03:58AM
(#14253823)
That the Senate isn't the south, and the Senate used to have an ex-Klansman in it (Robert Byrd), so even the Senate is better than it used to be.
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by my_first_acct on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @12:35AM
(#14253068)
Can't speak for the rest of the South, but Houston (which you might or might not count as a Southern city) elected an openly gay woman as mayor in 2009 [1]. The current mayor is African-American [2].
Obviously, looking at mayoral demographics is a pretty crude way of judging a city's tolerance, but it is better than extrapolating from news reports, which can hardly give a detailed picture of a region that encompasses a dozen or so states.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annise_Parker [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvester_Turner
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by Arizhel on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @03:19PM
(#14259121)
To be fair, Texas isn't really part of the "Deep South", and isn't really known to be as backwards and racist as places like MS, AL, etc.
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by dragonwriter on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @03:20PM
(#14259135)
> Texas isn't really part of the "Deep South"
I dunno, it seceded to protect slavery from twice as many countries as any other state in the South; that's got to count for something.
Re:The era of cheap suburban growth and development is over
by Arizhel on Thursday May 04, 2017 @11:25AM
(#14265502)
Tennessee seceded in the Civil War too but it's not part of the Deep South either. I think Arkansas did too, and that's definitely not part of the "South" at all. Same goes for Missouri.