News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by wtetzner on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @01:28PM (#14248462)
Yeah, this seems to be a common objection, but in my experience of actually having used a lisp (Clojure) in production, this was never a problem. Sure, you'll likely still end up with some technical debt, but no more than the Java project's we had at the same company. And not because of macros.

When people first learn about macros, they go crazy trying to do all kinds of things that weren't possible without macros. But once developers gain a little experience with macros, they learn to use them judiciously and tastefully.

Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by chongli on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @01:36PM (#14248557)
Clojure has a BDFL (Rich Hickey) and it lacks reader macros. It's kind of the exception that proves the rule.
Re:Not Lisp again (2009) by zeveb on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @02:13PM (#14248985)
To be fair, though, the macro-based River of Insanity newbie Lispers sometimes travel down is rarely based on reader macros.