Re:SQL is 43 years old – Here’s why we still use it today
by konradb on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @11:47AM
(#14247343)
Hi - yes you are definitely correct to make that distinction and I was only talking about (1), having forgotten (2). I see your point about the large joins required to get the information you need for a screen.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.