News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SQL is 43 years old – Here’s why we still use it today by dragonwriter on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @11:19AM (#14247075)
> I also think so but the issue has several important aspects which justify the use of the separate term "schemaless". One of them is that schema elements (say, column names) can be stored as normal data.

It is fundamental to the relational model that metadata like that is stored in and queryable from relations just like normal data.

There are no comments on this comment yet.